Tuesday, July 16, 2013

United States v. Perez-Valencia, No. 12-50063 (Trott with O'Scannlain and Clifton) ---

The Ninth Circuit remanded this case for the limited purpose of developing a more robust record on the question whether, under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2516, an elected district attorney properly delegated his authority to authorize wiretap applications presented to state courts to an assistant.

The decision is here:


Cannedy v. Adams, No. 09-56902 (O'Scannlain, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) ---

Another shot across the bough in the Ninth Circuit's continuing struggle to apply summary state habeas denials by California courts in federal habeas cases.

The opinion is here:



Post a Comment

<< Home