Apprendi Authority, Booker Impact
ND Cal AFPD Dan Blank has prepared a very useful of Apprendi authority (particularly in the Ninth Circuit) that will be important as we sort out Booker's impact.
APPRENDI CASE LIST
Booker, 2005 WL 50108 (U.S. Jan. 12, 2005) USSG advisory in light of Blakely
Patterson, 2004 WL 1858114 (9th Cir. 2004) ff. Thomas (not Ameline)
Quintana, 2004 WL 2047358 (9th Cir. 2004) ff. Almendarez-Torres
Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 (9th Cir. 2004) Blakely applies to USSG
Ortega-Ascanio, 376 F.3d 879 (9‘04) can w/d plea for change in law
Blakely, 2004 WL 1402697 (‘04) Apprendi applies to sen guidelines
Summerlin, 2004 WL 1402732 (‘04) Ring is Teague-barred
Rodriguez-Gonzalez, 2004 WL 309088 (9‘04) 1325 req charging prior
Thomas, 2004 WL 112644 (9‘04) BRD sentencing after open plea
Toliver, 351 F3d 423 (9‘03) knowing drug type/quantity not element
Villalobos, 333 F3d 1070 (9‘03) must inform drug quantity BRD at plea
Banuelos, 322 F3d 700 (9‘03) no admit to quantity means lowest max
Hernandez, 322 F3d 592 (9‘03) Buckland still good law after Harris
Velasco-Heredia, 319 F3d 1080 (9‘03) cf. Harris no mandatory mins
Sattazahn, 537 US 101 (‘03) ff. Apprendi
Valensia, 299 F3d 1068 (9‘02) plea colloquy must address drug quantity
Ring, 536 US 584 (‘02) Apprendi applies to death penalty
Harris, 536 US 545 (‘02) Apprendi does not apply to mand mins
Minore, 292 F3d 1109 (9‘02) drug quantity must be submitted to jury
Jordan, 291 F3d 1091 (9‘02) Apprendi error not harmless if sen > max
Cotton, 536 US 625 (‘02) plain error applies to Apprendi indictment req
Patterson, 292 F3d 615 (9‘02) court can reject plea if not = Apprendi
Buckland, 289 F3d 558 (9‘02) Apprendi applies to 21 USC 841
Carranza, 289 F3d 634 (9‘02) govt need not prove knowing drug t/q
Mendoza-Paz, 286 F3d 1104 (9‘02) § 960 const under Buckland
Rodriguez, 285 F3d 759 (9‘02) jury finding req for drug quantity
Henry, 282 F3d 242 (3‘02) sentencing jury for drug type / quantity
Collazo-Aponte, 281 F3d 320 (1‘02) Apprendi applies to 924(c)
Tighe, 266 F3d 1187 (9‘01) juvenile prior not covered by Almendarez-T
Antonakeas, 255 F3d 714 (9‘01) conspiracy sentence violated Apprendi
Saya, 247 F3d 929 (9‘01) career offender sentence violated Apprendi
Apprendi, 530 US 466 (‘00) facts > stat max proved to jury BRD
Almendarez-Torres, 523 US 224 (‘98) priors not elements of 1326
APPRENDI CASE LIST
Booker, 2005 WL 50108 (U.S. Jan. 12, 2005) USSG advisory in light of Blakely
Patterson, 2004 WL 1858114 (9th Cir. 2004) ff. Thomas (not Ameline)
Quintana, 2004 WL 2047358 (9th Cir. 2004) ff. Almendarez-Torres
Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 (9th Cir. 2004) Blakely applies to USSG
Ortega-Ascanio, 376 F.3d 879 (9‘04) can w/d plea for change in law
Blakely, 2004 WL 1402697 (‘04) Apprendi applies to sen guidelines
Summerlin, 2004 WL 1402732 (‘04) Ring is Teague-barred
Rodriguez-Gonzalez, 2004 WL 309088 (9‘04) 1325 req charging prior
Thomas, 2004 WL 112644 (9‘04) BRD sentencing after open plea
Toliver, 351 F3d 423 (9‘03) knowing drug type/quantity not element
Villalobos, 333 F3d 1070 (9‘03) must inform drug quantity BRD at plea
Banuelos, 322 F3d 700 (9‘03) no admit to quantity means lowest max
Hernandez, 322 F3d 592 (9‘03) Buckland still good law after Harris
Velasco-Heredia, 319 F3d 1080 (9‘03) cf. Harris no mandatory mins
Sattazahn, 537 US 101 (‘03) ff. Apprendi
Valensia, 299 F3d 1068 (9‘02) plea colloquy must address drug quantity
Ring, 536 US 584 (‘02) Apprendi applies to death penalty
Harris, 536 US 545 (‘02) Apprendi does not apply to mand mins
Minore, 292 F3d 1109 (9‘02) drug quantity must be submitted to jury
Jordan, 291 F3d 1091 (9‘02) Apprendi error not harmless if sen > max
Cotton, 536 US 625 (‘02) plain error applies to Apprendi indictment req
Patterson, 292 F3d 615 (9‘02) court can reject plea if not = Apprendi
Buckland, 289 F3d 558 (9‘02) Apprendi applies to 21 USC 841
Carranza, 289 F3d 634 (9‘02) govt need not prove knowing drug t/q
Mendoza-Paz, 286 F3d 1104 (9‘02) § 960 const under Buckland
Rodriguez, 285 F3d 759 (9‘02) jury finding req for drug quantity
Henry, 282 F3d 242 (3‘02) sentencing jury for drug type / quantity
Collazo-Aponte, 281 F3d 320 (1‘02) Apprendi applies to 924(c)
Tighe, 266 F3d 1187 (9‘01) juvenile prior not covered by Almendarez-T
Antonakeas, 255 F3d 714 (9‘01) conspiracy sentence violated Apprendi
Saya, 247 F3d 929 (9‘01) career offender sentence violated Apprendi
Apprendi, 530 US 466 (‘00) facts > stat max proved to jury BRD
Almendarez-Torres, 523 US 224 (‘98) priors not elements of 1326
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home