U.S. v. Turvin, No. 06-30551 (2-26-08). For about 14 minutes, it is a lawful traffic stop, and then the police ask an unrelated question: not about the speed limit, but about possible speed in the car. Is this a bad stop? The district court said, "yes," but the 9th (Wallace and Noonan) reverse, holding that asking unrelated questions did not extend the traffic stop unreasonably. The 9th reasoned that its prior decision in Mendez, 476 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2007), controlled because there, a stop was not deemed unreasonable even when questions went from the license plate registration to gang life. Dissenting, Paez argues that unrelated questions can be asked only if there is a reasonable basis; the officer cannot just ask about anything and everything. The majority believes that that requirement had been overruled by Mendez. Moreover, the 9th allows the time was not unduly extended with the questions.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Case o' The Week: Ninth Knocks BOP Rule Denying Ye...
- Raj v. Daniels, No. 07-35090 (2-20-08). The BOP s...
- U.S. v. Rosales, No. 05-30260 (2-13-08). This is ...
- Case o' The Week: Fifth Lives In Ninth, Anderson
- Harris v. Carter, No. 06-35313 (2-8-08). "Come on...
- Rogue Footnote Creates Need For Cert To Address Ex...
- Case o' The Week: Ninth Categorically Opposed (Sor...
- Ninth Circuit Practitioners: Time To Sign Up For E...
- U.S. v. Jennings, No. 06-30190 (2-4-08). Does the...
- Case o' The Week: Ninth Falls for Government's Sni...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home