U.S. v. Jimenez, No. 07-10399 (7-23-08). The 9th dialed "T" for drug trafficking when it comes to a prior conviction for unlawful use of communication facility under 21 USC 843(b). The defendant was convicted of a 1326, and given a 16-level enhancement for prior drug trafficking offenses. He appealed, arguing that use of a phone was not the same as trafficking, and he should just get the bump for an aggravated felony. The 9th (Duffy joined by B. Fletcher and Rymer) hung up on his argument. The 9th held, as did all the other circuits, that 843(b) is akin to drug trafficking.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Case o' The Week: The Fourth Reappears in Car Sear...
- U.S. v. Caseres, No. 06-50546 (7-21-08). The 9th ...
- Case o' The Week: Great Miranda Decision Involves ...
- U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 06-50461 (7-18-08). The 9th...
- U.S. v. Singh, No. 07-30150 (7-17-08). In an alie...
- U.S. v. Whitehead, No. 05-50458 (7-14-08). In an ...
- Case o' The Week: Fraud loss of $245,126 is not ov...
- Alternatives To Incarceration: The Sentencing Comm...
- U.S. v. Salman, No. 05-10093 (7-7-08). Defendant ...
- Case o' The Week: Warr - huh - What is it Good For...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home