U.S. v. Murillo, No. 07-50462 (12-1-08). Many state sentencing schemes allow for suspension of sentence with imprisonement for a year as a condition of probation. That was done here. This was a no-no. The Federal Sentencing Reform Act, and the Guidelines, do not allow for such a suspension. See also U.S. v. Mueller, 463 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2006). The sentence was vacated, and remanded for resentencing before a different judge.
Friday, December 05, 2008
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- U.S. v. Blixt, No. 07-30198 (11-26-08). What's in...
- Case o' The Week: Forged Signature Now "Aggravated...
- Case o' The Week: Gun in One's Lap Not "Knowing" P...
- Waldrip v. Hall, No. 07-55512 (11-18-08). The pet...
- Judge Mosman On Oral Argument
- Case o' The Week: You Can't Always Get What You Wa...
- Gallagher v. U.S. District Court, No. 07-74593 (11...
- Case o' The Week: Ninth Holds Out for Holdout, Wil...
- U.S. v. Miller, No. 07-30481 (11-7-08). Defendant...
- U.S. v. Youssef, No. 07-10335 (11-5-08). The defe...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home