U.S. v. James, No. 07-10122 (2-26-09). Once a juvenile is transferred to adult status, can new charges be added or does another transfer hearing have to take place? The 9th (Clifton joined by Hug and Roth) hold that it would serve little purpose to go back for a transfer hearing when the defendant has already been transferred. In this case, which involved murders, robberies, and sexual assaults on an Indian reservation, the 9th did find, with a government concession, that robbery and second-degree murder were lessers of a felony murder conviction, and so vacated. The defendant is still doing life.
Friday, February 27, 2009
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- U.S. v. Banks, No. 07-30130 (2-25-09). This is a ...
- U.S. v. Kincaid-Chauncey, No. 06-10544 (2-20-09). ...
- Case o' The Week: Strip Club Honest Services, Kinc...
- U.S. v. Garcia-Cardenas, No. 08-50117 (2-17-09). ...
- Case o' The Week: "Cursing the Opacity of Guidance...
- U.S. v. Autery, No. 07-30424 (2-13-09). This is a...
- U.S. v. Selby, No. 07-30183 (2-9-09). The 9th (pe...
- U.S. v. Romero-Ochoa, No. 08-30251 (2-5-09). Shou...
- Case o' The Week: A "WARRENless" Search Case with ...
- U.S. v. Al Nasser, No. 05-10466 (2-4-09). Three B...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home