U.S. vs. Ensminger, No. 08-30183 (6-3-09). Defendant plead guilty to a sex offender registration (SORNA) charge. As sentencing approached, a district court in the M.D. Fla held that SORNA was unconstitutional because it was outside of congressional commerce clause authority. The defendant sought to withdraw his guilty plea as this was a "fair and just" reason under Rule 11 and not a lark. "No" said the district court, sentencing him to 21 months, and scoffing at the other decision because it was out of district, out of circuit, and not convincing. The 9th (Tallman joined by W. Fletcher and Gould) found no abuse of discretion. The 9th discussed the standards for withdrawal. It recognized that a transformative decision, like from the Supremes, or circuit changes, present a fair and just reason. Here, though, the decision was non-precedential, non-binding, and from another court. The 9th noted that the constitutionality issue had been raised in other courts and circuits, and defense counsel was aware. The 9th only focused on whether the court abused its discretion to allow withdrawal, and explicitly did not decide the constitutionality of SORNA. That is left open for another appeal, and another panel.
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Scott v. Schriro, No. 05-99012 (6-2-09). The 9th ...
- U.S. v. Amezcua-Vasquez, No. 07-50239 (6-1-09). I...
- Case o' The Week: Key Date Is "Found In" Plea Agre...
- U.S. v. Medina-Villa, No. 07-50396 (5-28-09). The...
- U.S. v. Jefferson, No. 08-30067 (5-26-09). The 4t...
- Case o' The Week: The Price is Right --Discovery o...
- U.S. v. Maness, No. 06-30607 (5-19-09). The 9th c...
- Case o' The Week: Like Nigel's "Up to 11" -- Alder...
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. 07-30197 (5-15-09). Crawford ...
- U.S. v. Alderman, No. 07-30186 (5-12-09). The 9th...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home