U.S. v. Guzman-Mata, No. 08-10061 (8-27-09). The 9th (N. Smith joined by Noonan and Berzon) hold that alien smuggling under 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A) is categorically an "alien smuggling offense" triggering a +16 level adjustment under the Guidelines, 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). The argument was that the family exception in the statute for assisting spouse, child, or parent in being smuggled takes it out of strict categorical application. "Nice try," says the 9th, but that provision is an affirmative defense, and the elements setting out the offense categorically apply. The government does not bear the burden of showing that the exception does not apply.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- U.S. v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., No. 05-1...
- U.S. v. George, No. 08-30339 (8-25-09). The 9th (...
- U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 07-30098 (8-24-09). You "Ga...
- Today is a "trifecta" for Judge Reinhardt, as he a...
- Case o' The Week: Encore, Encore - Prosecutorial M...
- U.S. v. Harrison, No. 08-10391 (8-19-09). Is this...
- U.S. v. Thongsy, No. 08-30198 (8-17-09). Just bec...
- Case o' The Week: Fourth Amendment Victory a Red "...
- U.S. v. Riley, No. 08-50009 (8-13-09). How far ca...
- Richter v. Hickman, No. 06-15614 (8-10-09)(en banc...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home