Hamilton v. Ayers, No. 06-9908 (9-18-09). The 9th grants sentencing relief in this pre-AEDPA petition. The petitioner killed his wife for the insurance money. His trial lawyer had little experience (none capital) and mitigation and sentencing preparation appeared to be an afterthought. The 9th (Wardlaw joined by W. Fletcher and Paez) found IAC in the penalty phase, stressing the lack of investigation, preparation, and actual performance.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- U.S. v. Contreras, No. 08-50126 (9-17-09). The 9t...
- U.S. v. Chaney, No. 08-10298 (9-15-09). Defendant...
- Schad v. Ryan, No. 07-99005 (9-11-09). The 9th (S...
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 08-30094 (9-10-09). Appealin...
- Case o' The Week: No Acceptance for (Un)Appealing ...
- U.S. v. Charles, No. 08-50086 (9-9-09). The 9th c...
- U.S. v. Bride, No. 08-30266 (9-8-09). The defenda...
- Case o' The Week: Deja Vu, All Over Again - Knight...
- U.S. v. Knight, No. 08-30372 (9-2-09). The Knight...
- U.S. v. Inzunza, No. 05-50902 (9-1-09). This is a...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home