Tran-scending an En Banc Call
United States v. Tran, __ F.3d __, No. 07-30270 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2009) (ord. denying rehearing en banc.)
In June of 2009 we blogged that rarest of beasts: a good conspiracy decision. See blog here, discussing United States v. Tran__ F.3d __, No. 07-30270, 2009 WL 1773149 (9th Cir. June 24, 2009).
Surprisingly, someone did not share our view of Tran -- an en banc call went out. Today, happily, the Tran panel was vindicated: the petition for rehearing en banc was denied. See order here. Judges Gould, O'Scannlain, Kleinfeld, Tallman, Bybee, Callahan and Bea were less Tran-sfixed with the opinion and dissented from the order denying rehearing.
Now, let us all whistle collectively past the cert. graveyard . . .
Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. Cal. FPD. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
In June of 2009 we blogged that rarest of beasts: a good conspiracy decision. See blog here, discussing United States v. Tran__ F.3d __, No. 07-30270, 2009 WL 1773149 (9th Cir. June 24, 2009).
Surprisingly, someone did not share our view of Tran -- an en banc call went out. Today, happily, the Tran panel was vindicated: the petition for rehearing en banc was denied. See order here. Judges Gould, O'Scannlain, Kleinfeld, Tallman, Bybee, Callahan and Bea were less Tran-sfixed with the opinion and dissented from the order denying rehearing.
Now, let us all whistle collectively past the cert. graveyard . . .
Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. Cal. FPD. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
Labels: Conspiracy
posted by Steve Kalar at 10/23/2009 10:58:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home