U.S. v. Lee, No. 09-10126 (4-28-10) (D. Nelson with Farris and Bea). The defendant was charged with fraud in connection with a false identification conspiracy. The defendant got a driver's license using a fake tax I.D. number. The district court suppressed the driver's license because the government official that gave it to the defendant did not know it was forged at the time, and he would have to for a conspiracy. This was reversed by the 9th, stating that a defendant can use an innocent or unknowing person to effectuate the fraud. This was done here. The official that produces the document that is false need not know it was fake at the time.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Case o' The Week: Aptly-named Strickland Case Sets...
- Case o' The Week: A "Glock"-en-schpeal - Alderman ...
- U.S. v. Velasquez-Bosque, No. 09-50126 (4-15-10) (...
- Mora-Meraz v. Thomas, No. 09-35413 (4-14-10)(Tallm...
- Hein v. Sullivan, et al., No. 07-56277 (4-12-10) (...
- Case o' The Week: Not the "End of story as far as"...
- U.S. v. Juarez, No. 09-50323 (4-8-10) (per curiam ...
- U.S. v. Andrews, No. 09-30072 (4-7-10) (opinion by...
- U.S. v. Valencia-Barragan, No. 09-50018 (4-6-10) (...
- Case o' The Week: Taylor-Made Analysis -- Castro a...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home