U.S. v. Anderson, No. 09-50559 (11-16-10) (Per curiam with Pregerson, Ripple from the 7th Cir., Graber). "Hey, I only plead nolo...I didn't say I was guilty." How many times has a defendant said that when faced with a past conviction being used against him? In this case, the district court dismissed an indictment for being a prohibited possessor of a firearm because the defendant's two predicate California felonies were each a result of a nolo contendere plea. The 9th held that such a dismissal was clearly erroneous. The state statute, Calif. Penal Code 1016(3), clearly states a nolo contendere plea is equivalent to a guilty plea. The federal statute, 922(g)(1), looks to the state definition. The dismissal was reversed.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Case o' The Week: Detrimental, reliance - Schafer ...
- U.S. v. Diaz-Lopez, No. 09-50604 (11-9-10) (Gould ...
- Case o' The Week: The Ninth Gets it Wright -- Fed...
- U.S. v. Wright, No. 08-10525 (11-4-10) (M. Smith w...
- Smith v. Mitchell, No. 04-55831 (10-29-10) (per cu...
- U.S. v. Leal-Felix, No. 09-50426 (11-1-10) (Goodwi...
- Case o' The Week: Defense Appeals Acquittal - and ...
- U.S. v. Redlightning, No. 09-30122 (10-25-10) (Gou...
- U.S. v. Berry, No. 08-35002 (10-22-10) (Tashima wi...
- Case o' The Week: Goodwin Finds Gold in Corner of ...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home