United States v. Perez-Valencia,
No. 12-50063 (3-3-14) (Trott with O'Scannlain with Clifton).
This
case is about the proper delegation of authorization of wiretap approval. In this case, the 9th remanded to see if the
state district attorney's office had properly authorized the approval when the
district attorney was out of the jurisdiction.
The district court examined the delegation. The record indicated that the delegation was
for when the district attorney was absent and was for a bundle of authority and
was not a delegation of just the wiretap authority, even when the district
attorney was present. As such, the
delegation was proper, and so was the wiretap authority.Monday, March 03, 2014
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Case o' The Week: Tagging Sandbagging - Ninth, Mal...
- United States v. Yazzie, No. 12-10165 % US v. Ge...
- Case o' The Week: (En) Banc Robbery - Chandler and...
- United States v. Chandler, No. 12-10331 (2-20-1...
- United States v. Garcia-Santana, No. 12-10471 (2...
- Sentencing Innocence And Closed Files
- Case o' The Week: A Sour Limewire Holding - Vallej...
- United States v. Gonzalez-Monterroso, No. 12-101...
- United States v. Popov, No. 12-10045 (Feb. 11, 2...
- United States v. Vasquez-Perez, No. 12-10433 (2-...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home