Lesson: It’s got to be in the record. The 9th finds no Batson violations when the petition
appeal tries to rely on evidence of prospective juror comparisons between those
African American prospective jurors who were struck and others who were kept
on. Under AEDPA, the failure to include juror questionnaires and only a partial
voir dire transcript crimps the record. The state courts did not have them for
their review. Expansion of the record is not allowed at this stage. The 9th
also expressed skepticism that a comparison would have resulted in a Batson violation.
Monday, July 28, 2014
Case Summaries and Commentary by Federal Defenders of the Ninth Circuit
Contributors
Click here for Supreme Court & Other Circuit Blogs
Click here for Steve Sady's Blog Summary
Previous Posts
- Fong v. Ryan, No. 11-17051 (7-25-14)(Timlin (Sr....
- Case o' the Week: Ninth Not Confrontation-al, Over...
- Case o' The Week: Ninth Turns Up Nose at State Act...
- United States v. Ruiz, No. 13-30003 (Christen with...
- [Ed. note -- Sorry for the delay; Jon and I were ...
- Case o' The Week: Ninth Finds McDog Unappetizing -...
- Case o' The Week: "Show Me the Money" not Sanction...
- Case o' The Week: Four Days Too Slow, for I/A Show...
- US v. Shouse, No. 13-30134 (McKeown with Goodwin ...
- US v. Torres Pimental, no. 12-50038 (Pregerson w...
Free Publications
D-Web Law BlogsDefense Newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home