Judge o' The Week: The Honorable Judge Harry Pregerson
I’m invoking author’s privilege to pay
tribute to Judge Harry Pregerson, for whom I clerked. He passed away last week.
At the memorial service on Friday eloquent speakers
struggled with their tasks before a huge (and teary) crowd. Think of that that
trope of blind men describing their parts of an elephant – it was a life far too
big to take in with any one grab. I’ll therefore mull one small corner of the
Pregerson pachyderm: Harry the Judge.
In the Ninth the senior active member of a
three-judge panel assigns the job of writing the majority disposition. That
senior judge can accordingly horde a juicy plum of an opinion to write for
themselves. Appointed by Carter in 1979, the very senior Judge Pregerson often controlled
this valuable power of the pen.
So what high-profile appeals did he assign himself to write?
Inevitably, he took the Social Security benefit cases, the immigration appeals, the guideline arguments – legions of obscure and “unimportant” opinions that some of his colleagues may have been secretly relieved to dodge. Sure, he’d tackle cutting-edge con law cases, and yes, his decisions have made the New York Times. His real passions, however, were disability insurance benefits and the absurd intricacies of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The less powerful, prestigious and newsworthy the plaintiff or criminal defendant, the more likely that appeal would end up on the desk of a Pregerson clerk to help with a draft. See e.g., Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 1999) (Admin law judge required to call vocational expert for a disability claim) (citing, coincidentally, the persuasive authority of other J. Pregerson disability decisions!)
So what high-profile appeals did he assign himself to write?
Inevitably, he took the Social Security benefit cases, the immigration appeals, the guideline arguments – legions of obscure and “unimportant” opinions that some of his colleagues may have been secretly relieved to dodge. Sure, he’d tackle cutting-edge con law cases, and yes, his decisions have made the New York Times. His real passions, however, were disability insurance benefits and the absurd intricacies of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The less powerful, prestigious and newsworthy the plaintiff or criminal defendant, the more likely that appeal would end up on the desk of a Pregerson clerk to help with a draft. See e.g., Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 1999) (Admin law judge required to call vocational expert for a disability claim) (citing, coincidentally, the persuasive authority of other J. Pregerson disability decisions!)
Lipman
is a notable example of this opinion cherry-picking. Michael Lipman got
twenty-one months for illegal reentry. See
United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 728 (9th Cir. 1998). He had “numerous”
felony convictions. Id. Lipman argued
his guideline sentence should have been lower because he had been assimilated
into American society. Id. Honestly,
who really cares about the Lipmans in our world – undocumented aliens who have racked
up multiple felony priors and are convicted of illegal reentry?
Harry cared. Harry really cared.
In Lipman,
the Judge explained that cultural assimilation is a valid departure basis from the
(then) mandatory guidelines. Id. at
732. This 19-year old opinion is now a quirky little corner of the increasingly-irrelevant
sentencing guidelines. Yet judicial recognition of this important facet of our clients’
humanity has made a real difference for hundreds of assimilated undocumented aliens
facing harsh federal sentences.
Pregerson cared about the little guy. He even
cared when the little guy was – well, a bit of a schmuck. The Judge was a proud
Marine, a Purple Heart recipient who was grievously wounded on Okinawa in WWII.
Yet in two published cases Judge
Pregerson came out swinging hard on
behalf of our nutty clients who lied about receiving Purple Hearts. See e.g. Blog entry here, see also blog entry here . Remarkable opinions, written by a jurist and a veteran still limping from the shrapnel he carried.
I am one of the one hundred and fifty lawyers
who proudly serve in Harry’s Clerk Corps (he never discharged us from duty). We
clerks know that Judge Pregerson’s legal legacy isn’t a single bold
constitutional opinion, or his brave feuds with a misguided SCOTUS. His true judicial
legacies are the innumerable, obscure opinions of which you’ve never heard -- the
“unimportant” dispos that made a world of difference to the poor, to immigrants,
to our indigent clients facing unjust laws and punitive sentencing guidelines.
Gandhi allegedly
observed that “a nation’s greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest
members.” That’s an equally good yardstick for a judicial career. By that standard
(and by many others), the Ninth Circuit’s Honorable Judge Harry Pregerson was one
of the greatest.
Semper fidelis, HP.
Image of Judge Harry
Pregerson and clerks from http://www.dailynews.com/2016/11/10/from-a-hell-of-a-fight-to-fighting-for-the-underdog-dennis-mccarthy/
Image of Marine Harry Pregerson
from Memorial Service, Shrine Auditorium, December 1, 2017.
Steven Kalar, Federal Public Defender Northern District of
California. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
Labels: Pregerson
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home