Monday, March 25, 2019

1.     US v. Jauregui, No. 16-50429 (3-22-19)(Berzon w/N. Smith; concurrence by Berzon; dissent by Castel). In a fact-specific opinion, the 9th orders a resentencing in a conspiracy to import appeal. The resentencing was the result of the court sentencing the defendant for conspiracy to import meth, when the facts admitted at the sentencing was only for conspiracy to import marijuana. That conviction had a maximum of five years.  The issue was at the colloquy, the defendant only admitted he entered into a conspiracy for importing marijuana; he withdrew; and then he took the car over the border, when there was a reasonable foreseeability that it might contain meth. He admitted no facts of a meth importation conspiracy. Ninth Circuit precedent, US v. Banuelos, 322 F.3d 700 (9th Cir. 2003), requires admission of the object by the conspirators. A court under Apprendi cannot import facts of conspirators. The error was plain, and required a resentencing. The guilty plea remains. 

Concurring, Berzon argues that Banuelos muddied the conspiracy waters by using Guidelines and sentencing principles of “reasonably foreseeable” for the mental state required for conviction of conspiracy. This mental state of agreeing to the offense of conspiracy is distinct too from the substantive crimes under conspiracy (Pinkerton).

Castel argues there was no plain error.  If there is error, then the conviction must be vacated as the conspiracy to import marijuana was never charged.

The decision is here:

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2019/03/22/16-50429.pdf

2.     Troiano v. US, No. 18-15183 (3-22-19)(Tallman w/Bybee and N. Smith). The 9th considers the standard of review in a 2255 remedy proceeding.  The 9th explicitly holds that the standard of review applicable to a district court’s determination of an appropriate remedy in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding is abuse of discretion. This case involved a post-Johnson 2255 proceeding. The district court resentenced on only one count of four. The 9th finds no abuse of discretion in not holding a complete resentencing as only one count, separate, was impacted by Johnson.

The decision is here:

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2019/03/22/18-15183.pdf

1 Comments:

Blogger pakresky said...

ASS..WR.WB.SAYA PAK RESKY TKI BRUNAY DARUSALAM INGIN BERTERIMA KASIH BANYAK KEPADA EYANG WORO MANGGOLO,YANG SUDAH MEMBANTU ORANG TUA SAYA KARNA SELAMA INI ORANG TUA SAYA SEDANG TERLILIT HUTANG YANG BANYAK,BERKAT BANTUAN EYANG SEKARAN ORANG TUA SAYA SUDAH BISA MELUNASI SEMUA HUTAN2NYA,DAN SAWAH YANG DULUNYA SEMPAT DI GADAIKAN SEKARAN ALHAMDULILLAH SUDAH BISA DI TEBUS KEMBALI,ITU SEMUA ATAS BANTUAN EYANG WORO MANGGOLO MEMBERIKAN ANGKA RITUALNYA KEPADA KAMI DAN TIDAK DI SANGKA SANGKA TERNYATA BERHASIL,BAGI ANDA YANG INGIN DIBANTU SAMA SEPERTI KAMI SILAHKAN HUBUNGI NO HP EYANG WORO MANGGOLO (0823-9177-2208) JANGAN ANDA RAGU ANGKA RITUAL EYANG WORO MANGGOLO SELALU TEPAT DAN TERBUKTI INI BUKAN REKAYASA SAYA SUDAH MEMBUKTIKAN NYA TERIMAH KASIH
NO HP EYANG WORO MANGGOLO (0823-9177-2208)
BUTUH ANGKA GHOIB HASIL RTUAL EYANG WORO MANGGOLO
DIJAMIN TIDAK MENGECEWAKAN ANDA APAPUN ANDA MINTA INSYA ALLAH PASTI DIKABULKAN BERGAUNLAH SECEPATNYA BERSAMA KAMI JANGAN SAMPAI ANDA MENYESAL

angka;GHOIB: singapura
angka;GHOIB: hongkong
angka;GHOIB; malaysia
angka;GHOIB; toto magnum
angka”GHOIB; laos…
angka”GHOIB; macau
angka”GHOIB; sidney
angka”GHOIB: vietnam
angka”GHOIB: korea
angka”GHOIB: brunei
angka”GHOIB: china
angka”GHOIB: thailand

Tuesday, March 26, 2019 10:29:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home