Pages

▼
Friday, April 28, 2023

›
US v. Ramos , No. 21-10184 (4-10-23)(Owens w/Bybee; Collins partial dissent and partial concurrence)(Note: This is an AZ FPD case). This app...
Thursday, March 16, 2023

›
US v. Salazar , No. 22-50060 (3-8-23)(Tallman w/Schroeder & Ikuta).   This is a significant “safety valve” decision. On the government’s...

›
US v. Taylor , No. 21-10377 (3-1-23)(Bress w/VanDyke & Restani). This is about a car stop and whether the car stop was unreasonably pro...

›
1. US v. Alvarez , No 21-50088 (2-16-2023)(R. Nelson w/M. Smith & Drain). The 9th affirms a 1326 conviction. The defendant’s prior Ohio...
Monday, October 31, 2022

›
1.  US v. Richards , No. 21-10190 (10-31-22)(Callahan w/Bybee & Collins). The 9 th affirms two consecutive 24-month sentences for SR v...
Friday, October 28, 2022

›
US v. Holguin , No. 19-50158 (10-13-22)(Nguyen w/Bea; partial concurrence/partial dissent by Berzon).  It would be “prudent” to test expert ...

›
US v. Saelee , No. 20-10209 (10/11/22)(Collins w/Nguyen & Burgess). The 9th affirmed convictions for attempted possession of ecstasy and...
Sunday, September 25, 2022

›
1. US v. Chen, No. 20-50333 (9-14-22)(Navarro w/Rawlinson & Christen). “We hold that a district court may consider the First Step’s non-...
Monday, September 05, 2022

›
1. US v. Latu , No. 19-10069 (Nguyen w/Wardlaw & Owens). The 9 th affirms a conviction for Assault resulting in serious bodily injury ...

›
US v. Anderson , No. 20-50207 (8-25-22)(Rawlinson w/Owens; dissent by Fletcher). The 9th considers whether a contracted private security gu...

›
1. Nguyen v. Frauenheim , No. 20-56284 (8-22-22)(M. Smith w/Bade & VanDyke). The 9 th affirms denial of a habeas petition, finding no B...

›
Crespin v. Ryan, No. 18-15073 (8-19-22)(Hurwitz w/Hawkins & M. Smith). The 9 th affirms a conditional grant of habeas. This presents a...

›
1. US v. Rodriguez, No. 21-50108 (8-17-22)(M. Smith w/Bade; concurrence by VanDyke). The 9 th remands for resentencing. In sentencing for i...

›
US v. Magdaleno , No. 20-10390 (8-11-22)(Clifton w/M. Smith & Reiss). Siblings don’t qualify as an “intimate familial relationship”? At...

›
1. Fauber v. Davis , No. 17-99001 (8-5-22)(Bress w/Forrest; dissent by Watford). The 9 th affirms denial of a capital habeas. Under AEDPA d...
Wednesday, August 17, 2022

›
US v. Brown , No. 20-50313 (8-2-22)(Daniels w/McKeown & Ikuta). After such knowledge, what forgive? Sure, a bit poetic, but it comes in...

›
1.  United States v. Wright , No. 20-50361 (Bennett (D. Md.) with Berzon and Bea) –- The panel affirmed the denial of a motion for a sentenc...