Case o' The Week: Ninth Knocks Knock & Talk - Perea-Reyes, Curtilage, and Fourth Amendment
The Supreme Court has delivered good new
authority that strengthens the Fourth Amendment, that fatally undermines
previous Ninth Circuit law, and that produces great results for the defense.
Hey - it can happen. United States v. United States v. Perea-Rey, 2012 WL 1948973 (9th Cir. May 31, 2012), decision available here.
Players: Big win for San
Diego Ass't Fed Def. Gregory Murphy. Decision by Judge Wardlaw, joined by
Judges Goodwin and visiting Judge William Sessions.
Facts: Border patrol agents followed a man
who illegally crossed into the US. Id.
at *1. They watched the man go to Perea-Rey's home, enter through the gated
fence entrance, and knocked on the front door. Id. An agent then followed the man as he went into an adjacent
carport and met Perea-Rey: both were detained. Id. Perea-Rey refused to allow the agents in the house; agents with
guns pulled nonetheless ordered everyone out of the home. Id. Seven undocumented
aliens were ultimately found. Id. Perea-Rey
was charged with harboring undocumented aliens. Id. The district court found the carport was curtilage, but upheld
(most of) the search because "there was no reasonable expectation of
privacy because it could be observed from the sidewalk." Id.
Issue(s): "The
district court found that the carport, which the border agents occupied, was
part of the curtilage of Perea-Rey's home, and we agree." Id. "The district court . . .
reasoned that because the agents were able to freely enter the carport,
Perea-Rey had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the carport." Id. at *4.
Held: "The Supreme Court has explained
that the role of reasonable expectation analysis in evaluating the
constitutionality of searches of the curtilage is only in determining the scope
of the curtilage, and the not the propriety of the intrusion." Id. "[B]ecause [the carport] was
curtilage, it was constitutionally protected area, and the warrantless entry,
search and seizure by the agents violated Perea-Rey's Fourth Amendment
rights." Id.
Of Note: Judge Wardlaw
helpfully clarifies the "confusion that has existed for decades about the
"reasonable expectation of privacy" and a search of its home and
curtilage. Id. at *3. As the Supremes
just explained in Jones, the Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy
test "has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law
trespassory test." Id. at *4. In
other words, you retain a reasonable expectation of privacy in your home and
curtilage, even if they can be seen from a public area. Stuff seen may be fair
game for a warrant, id., but absent
another exception cannot justify warrantless entry.
How to Use: Perea-Rea's is a wonderful Fourth
Amendment case -- in addition to the curtilage and Jones' analyses, it has a great limitation of the "knock and
talk" doctrine. "Knock and talk" is that exception to
the warrant requirement that allows cops to intrude on the curtilage to talk
to occupants (and that tolerates searches done along the way). The theory of
the "knock and talk" was Ninth law that focused on the subjective
intent of the agents -- but that, explains Judge Wardlaw, has been made taboo
by the Supreme Court. Id. at *5
(citing Kentucky v. King, 131 S. Ct.
1849 (2011)). King "implicitly
overrules" the reasoning of Ninth
Circuit "knock and talk" law, observes Judge Wardlaw, and won't save
the search here. Id. at *6. Perea-Reyes is a very important case on
"knock and talk" -- will be our starting point when fighting
warrantless home and curtilage searches relying on this theory.
For Further Reading:
Investigators love Perea-Rea. In an
intriguing little footnote, the Court takes judicial notice of Google maps and
satellite images for determining the general location of the home. Id. at n.1 (citing a case that took
judicial notice of online distances calculations). Ever seen those to-the-inch
measurements that Google Earth can crank out? Maybe our investigators can
finally hang up their rolling measuring wheels (much to their delight). For a helpful guide on Google measurements,
see Google Earth Blog here.
Image of policemen at door from http://crimlaw.blogspot.com/2012/03/can-officer-enter-residence-to-arrest.html
Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. Cal. FPD. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
.
Labels: Curtilage, Fourth Amendment, Knock and Talk, Wardlaw
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home