Case o' The Week: Deja vu all over again, again - Aguilar-Turcios and Taylor approach after Decamps
Being vindicated by the Supreme Court? A close second. United States v. Aguilar-Turcios, 2014 WL 241868 (9th Cir. Jan. 23, 2014),
decision available here.
Players: Decision by Judge Paez, joined by Judges Fletcher and Bybee.
Amicus support from (former) San Diego Assistant Federal Defender Steve
Hubachek.
Facts: Aguilar-Turcios, a Honduran
national and LPR, was court-martialed after downloading child porn while a U.S.
Marine. Id. at *1. More specifically,
he pleaded guilty to violating a Department of Defense directive that
prohibited using a government computer for an “unauthorized purpose.” Id. “Unauthorized purposes” include “uses
involving pornography.” Id. He also
pleaded guilty to a charge of wrongfully possessing images of “minors engaging
in sexually explicit conduct.” Id.
Later, the government tried to remove Aguilar-Turcios by alleging that these
offenses were “aggravated felonies” because they were conduct involving child
pornography. Id. The IJ found that
one offense was an agg felony and ordered removal; Aguilar-Turcios appealed. Id. at *2. There followed a series of
decisions, tangled up with the developments of the “missing elements” rule and Aguila-Montes de Oca. Id. at *2. The Supreme Court then
rejected Aguila, adopted Decamps, and the case returned to the Ninth. Id. at *3.
Issue(s): Did the Article 92 UCMJ Article 92
conviction qualify as an aggravated felony, after Decamps?
Held: “Aguilar-Turcios’s
Article 92 conviction, predicated on a violation of section 2-301(a), is not
categorically an aggravated felony.” Id.
at *4. Moreover, the statute at issue is “missing this element altogether” [an
essential element of visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexual explicit
conduct]. Id. at *5. “The modified approach
thus has no role to play in this case.” Id.
“We have jurisdiction over this case, and we grant the petition for review
and remand to the BIA with instructions for the agency to vacate the removal
order against the petitioner.” Id.
Of Note: Fantastic! Aguilar-Turcios’
removal order is vacated! Life for this former Marine in the United States is
finally secure, after nearly a decade of litigation. Except . . . “[w]hile
Aguilar-Turcios’s appeal was pending before this court, and an order was in
place staying his removal, the government mistakingly removed Aguilar-Turcios
to Honduras.” Id. at *2 & n.6.
How to
Use: Decamps
is now settled law, but it always helps to have a clear explanation in a home
Circuit decision on how that opinion really works. And Judge Paez takes great
pains to explain it clearly – noting his original Aguilar-Turcios decision, Judge Bybee’s dissent, then Judge Bybee’s
Aguila Montes de Oca en banc decision – and Decamps, rejecting Judge Bybee’s AMdO approach and endorsing Judge Paez’s
(and the Ninth’s) limitations on the use of the modified categorical approach.
It isn’t quite crowing, but Judge Paez is particularly deliberate while
explaining the long battle over this Taylor
approach – and which side was the victor. The result is a clean explanation with nice sharp edges
on when the modified categorical approach is appropriate – and when it is not.
For
Further Reading: After Moneyball, Nate Silver, and the last Presidential elections, stats
are where it’s at. Or not. In a very
thoughtful article, Felix Salmon carefully explains, “Why Quants Don’t Know Everything.” See http://www.wired.com/business/2014/01/quants-dont-know-everything/
Turns out that professional baseball and the stock market learned the hard way that
models based solely on statistics aren’t quite the paradises promised by
bean-counters. This Wired magazine
article is a must read for any employee of any Federal Defender organization,
as the Administrative Office of the US Courts starts our short collective voyage
towards a Workload Staffing formula by Fiscal Year 2016.
Image of the Honorable Judge Richard Paez from https://mylaw.usc.edu/userfiles/Image/SConnect%2008-09/MootCourt09_mc004.jpg Image of Statistics t-shirt from http://www.neatoshop.com/product/Statistics-is-the-Art-of-Never-Having-to-Say-Youre-Wrong
Steven Kalar, Federal Public Defender N.D. Cal. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
Labels: Aggravated Felony, Bybee, Categorical analysis, Immigration, Modified categorical analysis, Paez, Sentencing, Taylor Analysis
1 Comments:
Psst — the case name is Aguilar-Turcios v. Holder.
Post a Comment
<< Home