United States v. Apel,
Nos. 13-50003, -50004, -50005 (per curiam; panel is Silverman, Rawlinson, and
Tunheim (D. Minn.)) ---
On
remand from the Supreme Court, the panel held that the defendant's conduct of
protesting on a closed military base in violation of a barment order was proscribed
under 18 U.S.C. ยง 1382, and that his conviction did not violate the First
Amendment for the reasons set forth in United States v. Albertini, 472
U.S. 675 (1985).
The
decision is here:
posted by Jon Sands at 9/22/2014 04:45:00 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home