United States v. Apel, Nos. 13-50003, -50004, -50005 (per curiam; panel is Silverman, Rawlinson, and Tunheim (D. Minn.)) ---
On remand from the Supreme Court, the panel held that the defendant's conduct of protesting on a closed military base in violation of a barment order was proscribed under 18 U.S.C. § 1382, and that his conviction did not violate the First Amendment for the reasons set forth in United States v. Albertini, 472 U.S. 675 (1985).
The decision is here: