Case o' The Week: Strickland Effective Assistance of Counsel - Purse Snatching Does not a C.O.V. Make
For Judge Owens, getting
to a guideline answer is as complicated as the calculations based upon the Staff of
Ra.
(Though for Indy -- and
Judge Kozinski -- getting it right seems pretty easy).
United States v. Strickland, 2017 WL
2723926 (9th Cir. June 26, 2017), decision available here.
Players: Decision by Judge Kozinski, joined by Judges Fisher
and Watford. Admirable win for R&W Attorney Elizabeth Daily and Chief
Deputy FPD Steve Sady, District of Oregon FPD.
Facts: Strickland pleaded guilty to being a felon in
possession of a gun. Id. at *1. That
§ 922(g)(1) offense made him an Armed Career Criminal, in the view of the
district court. Id.
Strickland
objected to the ACCA-predicate characterization of one of the three priors – an Oregon third
degree robbery – arguing that it did not qualify as a “Crime of Violence” for
the ACCA. Id.
Issue(s): “He appeals, arguing that he should be resentenced.”
Id. “The government argues that we
should nevertheless affirm Strickland’s sentence because his third degree robbery
conviction is a predicate offense under the force clause. We thus examine
whether the state offense satisfies the force clause’s requirements.” Id. “Our question is whether the term ‘physical
force’ as used in the Oregon statue is coextensive with the term’s use in the
ACCA.” Id. at *2.
Held: “We hold that it
is not, so a conviction for third degree robbery under Oregon law is not a
predicate offense under the ACCA. State cases show that Oregon doesn’t require
physically violent force . . . [Oregon] state cases demonstrate that state
courts don’t interpret the Oregon statute as requiring the use or threatened
use of violent force. Therefore, Oregon’s third degree robbery statute is not a
categorical match to the force clause.” Id. at *2.
Of Note: Oregon purse snatching does not a violent offense
make. So says Judge Kozinski in Strickland.
Id. at *2. And, last year, so said
Judge Watford in United States v. Parnell,818 F.3d 974, 979 (9th Cir. 2016). (Albeit a little reluctantly -- see id. at 982, Watford., J., concurring: “I join the court's opinion in full, although I confess
I was initially inclined to affirm the sentence. The notion that robbery is not
a “violent felony,” as that term is defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act
(ACCA), strikes me as counterintuitive to say the least. Holding that armed
robbery doesn't qualify as a violent felony seems even more absurd. But, as the
court's opinion persuasively explains, that conclusion is compelled by two
oddities of Massachusetts law.”)
Interesting that Judge Watford
was, at one time, a Ninth Circuit clerk, working for his colleague that is now
the author of the Strickland
decision.
For a big Circuit, it is a small
world.
How to Use:
Johnson warrior Liz Daily has
observed that the Oregon third degree robbery statute is similar to that of
many other states.
The Strickland win
certainly undermines the C.O.V. dangers of Oregon Robbery II (ORS
164.405(1)(b), and gives us a welcome boost attacking the robbery convictions
of other states as well.
For Further
Reading: Last week Judge Owens complained that
guideline sentencing is “more complicated than reconstructing the Staff of Ra
in the Map Room to locate the Well of Souls.” United States v. Perez-Silvan, 2017 WL 2784971, *7 (9th Cir. June 28, 2017).
An apt analogy, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Well of
Souls: dank places infested with dangers, threatening permanent entombment with
the slightest misstep.
Judge Owens continues to “urge the Commission
to simplify the Guidelines.” Id. Simplification,
however, can be dangerous business. At least one prominent Sentencing Commissioner
seems keen on simplifying the guidelines to the point of becoming presumptive
(read, “mandatory.”) See Remarks of Judge
William Pryor, May 17, 2017 at Scalia Law School, George Mason University, available
here.
Image
of Indy with the Staff of Ra. identifying the Well of Souls from http://earnthis.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-staff-of-ra-egypt-tomb.jpg
Image of Indy in the Well of Souls from http://i53.tinypic.com/2yuavz5.jpg
Steven
Kalar, Federal Public Defender N.D. Cal. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
Labels: ACCA, Crime of Violence, Johnson, Kozinski, Owens, Presumptive Guidelines, Robbery, Watford
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home