US v. Jones, No. 17-15869 (12-15-17)(Per curiam
w/Motz, M. Smith, and Nguyen).
This is an Az FPD
case. The 9th holds that Arizona's armed
robbery, Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-1904, does not qualify as a COV under ACCA because
of the categorical approach. The 9th
follows US v. Molinar, No. 15-10430,
2017 WL 5760565 (9th Cir. Nov. 29, 2017), where the 9th held that Az's armed
robbery is not a COV under the force clause of the Guidelines, but was under
the enumerated felonies clause. However,
Molinar does not apply to ACCA's
enumerated felonies clause. See US v. Dixon, 805 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir.
2015). "Therefore, Arizona armed
robbery also does not qualify as a violent felony under ACCA's enumerated
felonies clause."
Congrats to AFPD Keith Hilzendeger (FPD
Az -Phoenix). A shout out is also in
order for AFPD Ryan Moore (FPD Az -
Tucson) for his work and partial but significant victory in Molinar.
The decision is here:
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/12/15/17-15869.pdf
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home