Case o' The Week: A Good Win, and a Tremendous Loss -- Wolf Child and Conditions of Supervised Release
The Honorable Judge Betty Fletcher |
An important win in the Ninth is sadly overshadowed this week, by
the loss of one of the Ninth’s (and nation’s) leading jurists: the Honorable
Betty Binns Fletcher.
United States v. Wolf Child, 2012 WL 5200347(9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2012), decision available here.
Players: Big win for Dan Donovan, Federal Defenders of Montana alumnus.
Decision by Judge Reinhardt, joined by Judges Schroeder and M. Smith.
Facts: Wolf Child pleaded guilty to
attempted sexual abuse of a 16-year old. Id.
at *1- *2. At sentencing, the district court imposed a contested special
condition of supervised release. Id
at *1.. The court prohibited Wolf
Child from residing with, or being in the company of, any child under the age
of 18 – including his fiancée, and daughters – without prior written approval
of his probation officer. Id. The
court imposed this condition “on the basis of a record devoid of evidence
supporting the need for such a restriction with respect to his intimate family
members.” Id.
Issue(s): “Wolf Child . . . appeals [the] special condition of supervised
release . . .” Id. at *1.
Held: “We
hold that the fundamental right to familial association, implicated by the
parts of the special condition prohibiting Wolf Child from residing with or
being in the company of his own daughters and socializing with his fiancée, is
a ‘particularly significant liberty interest.’ The district court was therefore
required to follow an enhanced procedural requirement to make special findings
on the record supported by evidence in the record, that the condition is
necessary for deterrence, protection of the public, or rehabilitation, and that
it involves no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary.
Because the district court made no such findings regarding the imposition of
the special condition, and it conducted no individualized examination of Wolf
Child's relationship with the affected family members, it committed procedural
error with regard to these specific individuals. Moreover, because of the
absence of any evidence in the record that would support the limitations on the
fundamental liberty interests at issue, we hold that special condition 9, as
applied to restrict Wolf Child's ability to reside or socialize with his own
children and with his fiancée is substantively unreasonable. In addition, we
conclude that special condition 9 is overbroad both by virtue of prohibiting
Wolf Child from being in the company of any child under the age of 18 under any
circumstances and by similarly prohibiting him from dating or socializing with
anybody who has children under the age of 18, regardless of the circumstances,
without prior approval of his probation officer." Id. at *1.
Of Note: Judge Reinhardt writes a beautiful explanation of review of
conditions of supervised release – a highly-commended primer. Id. at *3-*4. The broad Carty/Zavala deference familiar at
sentencing does not flatly apply in this context: instead, when conditions of
supervised release implicate a “particularly significant liberty interests” greater
individualized showings are required (and greater appellate scrutiny merited). Id. at *3.
How to
Use: Wolf Child immediately reverberated
in the district courts. In N.D. Cal., one careful DJ has already put the
government on notice of Wolf Child’s
requirements for individualized showings. It is a timely decision: Probation now
routinely seeks non-individualized and intrusive S.R. conditions, parroting blanket
requirements dictated by D.C. (including mandatory polygraphs for putative “treatment”,
with no non-pros protections.) Wolf Child is a welcome tool to fight Probation’s
“one size fits all” approach to supervised release.
For
Further Reading: Our country lost a legendary advocate
for justice with the recent passing of the Hon. Judge Betty Fletcher. Others
have commented on her historical role in the Ninth. See New York Times article here.
We here pay tribute to Judge Fletcher’s extraordinary contributions to the
defense of indigent clients. In sentencing, in Fourth Amendment litigation, in
criminal discovery, and in capital cases, Judge Fletcher was always a voice for the
voiceless, a powerful defender of the powerless, and a fierce protector of constitutional
protections. For a small slice of her remarkable legacy in federal criminal
justice jurisprudence, see collection of blogs here.
Everyone has their favorite B. Fletcher opinion. For sheer intellectual honesty, beauty in legal writing, dogged independence, and good old-fashioned Liberal instincts, ours is her post-Apprendi dissent on acquitted conduct in sentencing, in United States v. Mercado, 474 F.3d 654, 658 (9th Cir. 2007), summarized here.
A tremendous loss to the Ninth, and to everyone dedicated to the defense
of indigent clients.
Image of the
Honorable Judge Betty B. Fletcher from http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/c0.0.300.300/p403x403/396173_10151122152380784_2089546632_n.jpg
Steven
Kalar, Federal Public Defender N.D. Cal. Website at www.ndcalfpd.org
.
Labels: 18 USC 3583 (Supervised Release), Appellate Review, B. Fletcher, Milan Smith, Reinhardt, Schroeder, Sentencing - Statement of Reasons, Supervised Release
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home